Fraction spends about half the issue on Tony, the rest is the set-up for future issues. Uneven; swell fight art.
The Invincible Iron Man 11
March 11th, 2009 - Respond
The Invincible Iron Man 10
March 6th, 2009 - Respond
Fraction makes some good deliberate moves. Lots of character stuff, not a lot of Iron Man. Dark Reign is absurd.
The Invincible Iron Man 9
March 6th, 2009 - Respond
I usually don’t care for Larroca, but this art’s a rushed mess. The colorist works more here. The story’s decent.
The Invincible Iron Man 8
March 6th, 2009 - Respond
What a fun read. Fraction depends too much on first person narration; otherwise it’s great. Larroca’s art is not.
Invincible Iron Man 7
November 12th, 2008 - Respond
Fraction writes a bad post-Brand New Day Spidey guest. Larocca’s photo-art is annoying; it is all lame and worthless.
Invincible Iron Man 6
November 7th, 2008 - Respond
Boo! Boo! Terribly paced–the comic was actually better as a movie tie-in–not to mention proto-Iron Fascist. Crappy.
Invincible Iron Man 5
November 7th, 2008 - Respond
It’s an all-action issue, so the goofy writing is somehow better (there aren’t any movie references). But it’s lousy.
Invincible Iron Man 4
November 7th, 2008 - Respond
Fraction’s writing a treatment for the sequel, not a comic. The art gets real ugly in it too. Plus, it is all filler.
Invincible Iron Man 3
November 7th, 2008 - Respond
There’s apparently a formula to how many movie references an issue–three, evenly paced throughout. There’s no story.
Invincible Iron Man 2
November 7th, 2008 - Respond
Even more references to the movie. Larroca’s art is less offensive. The writing’s adroit but hollow–good Thor cameo.
Invincible Iron Man 1
November 7th, 2008 - Respond
Is there a story behind all the movie references? Maybe. Is the story good? Eh… and Larroca’s photo-art is hideous.